I have to disagree with the first question. Poker is often referred to as a long game and is most prominent in cash game settings. Even if you visit your local poker room a few days a week, the results of each session are less important when playing $ 1 or $ 2 No Limit Hold’em.
The decisive factor is how successful I am in the long run. However, the same is true for tournaments. Let’s say your poker room hosts a re-entry tournament every Tuesday night. Same purchase, same structure, and more or less the same field every week. Come to think of it, what’s the difference if you play the tournament again tonight, or if you come back next Tuesday and play later? How do players love him because he has no money to come back? The difference between a player who does not rejoin and another player who rejoins once a week on average is not that the player who rejoins has an economic advantage.
That is, one of them plays 40-50 discs a year and the remaining 80-100 discs access the online game agent halo69. If you have the same skill level, you will get the same rate of return on investment. However, returning players have no advantage over players who cannot or cannot return. Yes, repeaters are more likely to make money tonight and win today’s tournaments. In this example, the probability is twice as high. But they also spent twice as much money on that victory. If these two players have the same skill level, they will eventually win or lose the same amount in each game slot online. Dollars invested in access.